This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| 2 minutes read

Entrepreneurs' relief changes: three traps for "genuine entrepreneurs"

The changes to entrepreneurs' relief (ER) announced at the Budget are to ensure the relief goes to "genuine entrepreneurs". Conceptually, the changes were simple. First, for share disposals from 29 October 2018, the five per cent holding requirement now includes a five per cent economic test. Second, for disposals from 6 April 2019, the holding period requirement is extended to two years (from one year).

Whilst that sounds simple, the changes contain traps for those who would normally expect to benefit from the relief.

1. "Real owners": beware venture capital, preferred equity and non-vanilla debt

The first trap is to assume that, as a "real" owner of at least five per cent, you meet the five per cent economic test. This is particularly the case if venture capital has been advanced to the company.

The new test requires the shareholder to have at least a five per cent interest in both the company's distributable profits and its assets on a winding up. Both are tested against amounts available for distribution to “equity holders”. The trap is that "equity holders" can include quasi-lenders rather than owners, which can dilute the "real owners" to below five per cent.

For example, fixed rate preference shareholders are disregarded when applying the five per cent tests. But "fixed rate preference shares" have a very restricted definition and do not include, for example, shares whose coupon is a fixed percentage of the subscription price rather than nominal value. Holders of such preferred capital are therefore taken into account when applying the five per cent tests. 

Similarly, holders of convertible debt, and debt with other equity-like features, are taken into account. The effect is that preference shares and equity-like debt (including Series A or Series B venture capital) can dilute the "real owners" to below five per cent for ER purposes.

Those in this position should consider whether the capital structure can be reorganised to preserve access to ER for the "real owners": this would need to be implemented at least two years before any disposal to qualify for ER.

2. Acquisitions since April 2017: take care over the timing of future disposals 

In contrast to share sales, the five per cent tests have never applied to sales of businesses, including sales of businesses via LLPs and partnerships. Members of LLPs and partnerships might therefore think that the extended five per cent tests can be ignored.

However, since 2014, ER can be restricted on LLP / partnership / business sales where a seller holds an equity interest in the buyer, or takes consideration in the form of shares in the buyer (this is an anti-avoidance rule to prevent ER on the incorporation of a business, but as ever the net is cast widely). To date, the rule has only applied where a seller (or certain connected persons) holds or acquires five per cent of the nominal value of the buyer's share capital (or five per cent of the voting rights in the buyer). This five per cent test now also captures five per cent economic entitlements, using the "equity holder" test described above. 

This is a trap for any sale involving a business / LLP / partnership and now means that any vendor financing (including the terms of any vendor loan notes) needs to be considered carefully.

This measure ensures that the claimant has a true material stake in business in order to claim entrepreneurs’ relief.


tax, entrepreneurs relief, venture capital, mergers and acquisitions, execs and business leaders, growth venture capital