In a welcome move for those responsible for tax matters at large businesses, today’s Budget documents contain an announcement that the government is dropping the most controversial aspect of its new uncertain tax treatments disclosure regime.
In a previous post we discussed the draft legislation published in July this year requiring the notification of uncertain tax treatments. Under the proposed legislation there would have been a requirement to notify where:
- a provision was made in the accounts of the business to reflect tax uncertainty in accordance with GAAP;
- a tax position taken was contrary to the known position of HMRC; or
- there was a “substantial possibility” that a tribunal or court would disagree with a tax treatment applied.
The final provision caused some concern among taxpayers and advisers. It was widely felt that trigger (3) was subjective, and there would be inherent uncertainty in applying the test contained in the draft legislation. These concerns were heightened by a review of the accompanying draft guidance, which appears to have some difficulty articulating with much certainty how the trigger should be applied in different scenarios.
Today’s announcement states that trigger (3) has been dropped from the regime (albeit leaving open the possibility it will be added later). Instead, notification will only be required where a provision has been made under GAAP or where a tax position taken is contrary to the known position of HMRC.
This is a welcome and pragmatic change to this legislation which means notification will now be based solely on two clearer and more objective triggers.